Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Marjorie J. Jones v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. MYSE, J. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13230 - 2017-09-21
DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. MYSE, J. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13230 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the sufficiency of a complaint de novo. See id. We take the facts set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138605 - 2015-03-30
. We review the sufficiency of a complaint de novo. See id. We take the facts set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138605 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
Wiederholt Excavating & Trench v. William Probst
of an administrative rule, like the interpretation of a statute, is a question of law that we review de novo. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14154 - 2014-09-15
of an administrative rule, like the interpretation of a statute, is a question of law that we review de novo. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶3 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072969 - 2026-02-04
¶3 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072969 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
WI App 31
is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We also review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650417 - 2023-07-12
is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We also review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650417 - 2023-07-12
[PDF]
Donald Jensen v. A Complete Spa & Pool Supply Centre, Inc.
Spa was a valid contract under § 402.201(1) is a question of law that we review de novo. See First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15844 - 2017-09-21
Spa was a valid contract under § 402.201(1) is a question of law that we review de novo. See First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28362 - 2014-09-15
We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28362 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief” is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90590 - 2012-12-17
, would entitle the defendant to relief” is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90590 - 2012-12-17
Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee v. Jacqualin King
court encompasses the correct dispute being tried is a matter of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7513 - 2005-03-31
court encompasses the correct dispute being tried is a matter of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7513 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
acceptance of responsibility … as ‘de minimus’” and considered that to be an aggravating factor; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35639 - 2009-02-23
acceptance of responsibility … as ‘de minimus’” and considered that to be an aggravating factor; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35639 - 2009-02-23