Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] Susette Hanlon v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
appeal to the Board of Regents met with the same result. The Board concluded that the PAP did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6755 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
information. The officer learned that Holt did not have a valid driver’s license. The officer returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212396 - 2018-05-10

State v. Carlton Maruki Jones
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it sentenced Jones, and did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17664 - 2005-04-11

[PDF] Disposition table for January & February 2007
., did not participate. 02/12/2007 2005AP1629 Stone v. Acuity 01/11/2007 2005AP1638 Heikkinen v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29165 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Fitzroy Donaldson
postconviction relief, did not hold a Machner hearing on Donaldson’s allegations. Instead, the court allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13410 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Carlos A. Abadia
because, he claims, the trial court did not explain, and he did not understand, the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24990 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the bowling alley at the time of the shooting. At trial, Pittman testified that she did not recall having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64699 - 2011-05-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he did explain to Schneider the elements of substantial battery, the meaning of party-to-a-crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189890 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
and future pain and suffering. Because the trial court did not err in finding a civil rights violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5648 - 2017-09-19

State v. David M. Womble
was ineffective because he did not file a motion to conduct an individual voir dire of the officers on the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31