Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 68502 for did.

94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
conclude that the trial court did not err in its ruling on disqualification or denial of the directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11861 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George Toland Ziedonis
“pretty vicious,” and that although they did consider shooting them, they opted not to because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concludes that the trial evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867009 - 2024-10-30

[PDF] State v. Xavier J. Rockette
inability to remember earlier testimonial statements did not implicate the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25320 - 2017-09-21

State v. George Toland Ziedonis
Matte testified that the dogs were “pretty vicious,” and that although they did consider shooting them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19809 - 2005-12-11

[PDF] State v. Richard L. Bowers
of consecutive sentences did not constitute a breach of the plea agreement. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7476 - 2017-09-20

State v. Willie Cooper
he did not consent, the officers did not have a warrant, and none of the exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25111 - 2006-05-10

[PDF] 94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
that the trial court did not err in its ruling on disqualification or denial of the directed verdict. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dale L. Hamann
was waived. Therefore, it did not automatically grant a new trial under State v. Ramos, 211 Wis. 2d 12, 564
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15089 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph J. Guerard
but consecutively to prison on the remaining five theft counts. Guerard’s initial appellate counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5640 - 2005-03-31