Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 82874 for simple case search.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 82874 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
Whether such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and unwarranted in this relatively simple case. 2. The use of name calling is out of line. 3. Asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818006 - 2024-06-25
and unwarranted in this relatively simple case. 2. The use of name calling is out of line. 3. Asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818006 - 2024-06-25
2010 WI APP 20
2010 WI App 20 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP203 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46376 - 2010-02-23
2010 WI App 20 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP203 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46376 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting Julian Thomas’s motion to suppress evidence collected during a search of Thomas’s living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216144 - 2018-07-26
granting Julian Thomas’s motion to suppress evidence collected during a search of Thomas’s living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216144 - 2018-07-26
State v. Tory M. Meyer
. IV. ¶37 In sum, we conclude that the anticipatory search warrant in the present case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17140 - 2005-03-31
. IV. ¶37 In sum, we conclude that the anticipatory search warrant in the present case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17140 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tory M. Meyer
in this case did not authorize a search for the intercepted mail package alone; rather, the warrant also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17140 - 2017-09-21
in this case did not authorize a search for the intercepted mail package alone; rather, the warrant also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17140 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in her response brief. And while Bert takes the time to identify these cases for us, his own briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929419 - 2025-03-18
in her response brief. And while Bert takes the time to identify these cases for us, his own briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929419 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Terry H. Redmond
in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both cases were justified because in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21
in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both cases were justified because in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Egerson
in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both cases were justified because in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21
in two cases. The State maintains that the searches in both cases were justified because in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21