Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28201 - 28210 of 46941 for shows.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP1031-CRNM 3 the crimes charged. The record shows the pleas were knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11

State v. Forest S. Shomberg
volunteered to take a polygraph examination. Such evidence is admissible only if the defendant shows that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7354 - 2005-03-31

Gregory Wolf v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
findings, the record must affirmatively show that LIRC had the benefit of the ALJ's personal impressions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8985 - 2005-03-31

City of Neenah v. Michael A. Bellin
department and issued him an OWI citation. The results of the intoxilyzer test given at the station showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15106 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cory D. Klicko
a sufficient showing on one of them. See id. at 688. Here, we conclude that Klicko has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16112 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Herman Lundgren
that the investigatory stop was based on a hunch. Id. at ¶23. ¶12 Here, the evidence shows that Pellet relied on more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3915 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Carol A. Hayes
to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25309 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas G. Larson
must show that it was destroyed in bad faith. Id. Even assuming every witness might potentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5754 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Amusement Devices, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
standard. ¶8 The commission, in deciding that Amusement Devices did not show good cause, noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3246 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Roger A. McGinnis
of showing that the revocation was not duly made and that McGinnis was not aware of his revoked status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19