Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28211 - 28220 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28211 - 28220 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
State v. Travis Blanks
. The case went to trial on July 18, 1994, after two earlier adjustments and the withdrawal of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8701 - 2005-03-31
. The case went to trial on July 18, 1994, after two earlier adjustments and the withdrawal of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of child pornography within a single case do not constitute convictions on “separate occasions” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767912 - 2024-02-28
of child pornography within a single case do not constitute convictions on “separate occasions” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767912 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
. In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, therefore it is only necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
. In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, therefore it is only necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647907 - 2023-04-25
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647907 - 2023-04-25
State v. Richard J. Wooster
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 2, 1995, this case was submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 2, 1995, this case was submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this case to effectively revive the appeal they voluntarily dismissed in the prior case or to otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350865 - 2021-03-30
this case to effectively revive the appeal they voluntarily dismissed in the prior case or to otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350865 - 2021-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The details of the sexual assault charge in this case are not relevant to the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343952 - 2021-03-09
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The details of the sexual assault charge in this case are not relevant to the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343952 - 2021-03-09
Gerald Archambault v. A-C Product Liability Trust
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95‑3266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10017 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95‑3266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10017 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in these cases and the parties separately briefed the issues. On our own motion, we now consolidate the cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189463 - 2017-09-21
in these cases and the parties separately briefed the issues. On our own motion, we now consolidate the cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189463 - 2017-09-21