Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28221 - 28230 of 62111 for child support.
Search results 28221 - 28230 of 62111 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supporting documents with its original motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331068 - 2021-02-02
supporting documents with its original motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331068 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
. ¶6 Kroeplin’s argument supporting the trial court’s decision overstates the record. Kroeplin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
. ¶6 Kroeplin’s argument supporting the trial court’s decision overstates the record. Kroeplin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the facts and circumstances preceding the initial stop support a finding of reasonable suspicion, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
that the facts and circumstances preceding the initial stop support a finding of reasonable suspicion, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and dismissed the Herrmanns’ remaining claims for failure to file supporting affidavits. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33861 - 2014-09-15
, and dismissed the Herrmanns’ remaining claims for failure to file supporting affidavits. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33861 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jamale A. Bonds
criminal. In order to support the repeater allegation, the State attached three certified judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19727 - 2017-09-21
criminal. In order to support the repeater allegation, the State attached three certified judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19727 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert E. Morrison
process rights and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8166 - 2005-03-31
process rights and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
these findings do not provide a legitimate basis for denying parole, are not supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49112 - 2014-09-15
these findings do not provide a legitimate basis for denying parole, are not supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49112 - 2014-09-15
Frederick Spivey, Jr. v. William G. Otto
N.W.2d at 633-34. The Court stated that if circumstantial evidence supports equal inferences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8264 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 633-34. The Court stated that if circumstantial evidence supports equal inferences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the judge does not need to restate the reasons supporting the original sentencing. Id., ¶9. We “consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197192 - 2017-10-04
, the judge does not need to restate the reasons supporting the original sentencing. Id., ¶9. We “consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197192 - 2017-10-04
Howard Eytcheson v. Randy L. Eytcheson
the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment. Background ¶2 Howard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3529 - 2005-03-31
the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment. Background ¶2 Howard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3529 - 2005-03-31