Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28221 - 28230 of 30123 for de.
Search results 28221 - 28230 of 30123 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute are reviewed de novo. State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis. 2d 321, 780 N.W.2d 63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702306 - 2023-09-13
of a statute are reviewed de novo. State v. Wood, 2010 WI 17, ¶15, 323 Wis. 2d 321, 780 N.W.2d 63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702306 - 2023-09-13
Brown County v. Kathy C.
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2692 - 2005-03-31
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2692 - 2005-03-31
Roy S. Thorp v. Town of Lebanon
the complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14388 - 2005-03-31
the complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14388 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 47
. Determining which statute of limitations applies to an action is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687303 - 2023-10-11
. Determining which statute of limitations applies to an action is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687303 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
we review de novo. Fredrick v. City of Janesville, 92 Wis. 2d 685, 688, 285 N.W.2d 655, 657 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3175 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. Fredrick v. City of Janesville, 92 Wis. 2d 685, 688, 285 N.W.2d 655, 657 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3175 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donna Kurer v. Parke
). Although we value a circuit court’s analysis, our review of its grant or denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6250 - 2017-09-19
). Although we value a circuit court’s analysis, our review of its grant or denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6250 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kelley L. Hauk
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4096 - 2017-09-20
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4096 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Marie Calbert v. Erin Briggs
OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI App 60, 242 Wis. 2d 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4028 - 2017-09-20
OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI App 60, 242 Wis. 2d 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4028 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
to present a defense was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
to present a defense was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI 24
). We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28210 - 2007-02-21
). We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28210 - 2007-02-21