Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28221 - 28230 of 61764 for does.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
what would otherwise be a temporary seizure into an arrest.” Watson does not dispute that, initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of these complaints are persuasive. ¶24 To begin, Burkhart does not specify how his ability to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327034 - 2021-01-27

[PDF] NOTICE
)(a). Upon resuming, the trial court stated that “after reading the headnotes and the statute, it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30087 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Marjorie M. Veeser
. First, she argues that the entry does not fall under any exception to the warrant requirement. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5194 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David C. Hertzberg
does not require that the juvenile be present. When a statute designates the form of conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9494 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
is the impact of the decision? When does that go into effect?” The court reasoned: [T]he bottom line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102955 - 2013-10-14

Finance Service Corporation v. Harold E. Drees
that it was not adequately served, and therefore, does not constitute an answer.” It then pointed out that three subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19833 - 2005-10-03

[PDF] NOTICE
; and therefore, the Board does not have jurisdiction to hold a hearing on Thomas’s claim that the Police Chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33641 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Outagamie County v. Town of Greenville
. STAT. § 66.60(12)(a) does not. ¶9 This court has recognized that “[i]f a statute contains a given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15649 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronald Salmons
assault." Id. at 788, 456 N.W.2d at 607. If the evidence does not meet this basic threshold, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13400 - 2005-03-31