Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28221 - 28230 of 58312 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
property.1 We agree with the trial court that under Wisconsin law these items constitute intangible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8902 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gilbert Jensen v. Cristyn Baker
. Jensen filed a replevin action seeking return of the Neon and $5,000 in damages. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4918 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-part jury trial where, in phase one, a jury found him guilty of seven counts of possession of child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103880 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. Milton Hill appeals a judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103229 - 2013-10-16

Washburn County v. Mark Casper
argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of his blood alcohol test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11368 - 2005-03-31

State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
assistance of counsel during his trial. We affirm. ΒΆ2 A police informant bought drugs from a man
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5997 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial and appellate counsel, alleged prosecutorial misconduct, and the alleged insufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30604 - 2007-10-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of commitment after a two-part jury trial where, in phase one, a jury found him guilty of seven counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103880 - 2013-11-05

[PDF] State v. Morris F Clement
. Clement argues: (1) the real controversy has not been fully tried because the trial court incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19476 - 2017-09-21

James Annoye v. The Yacht Club at Sister Bay Condominium Association, Inc.
In February 2003, the trial court held that the condo merger was valid and granted the summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18752 - 2005-06-27