Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28231 - 28240 of 30177 for de.
Search results 28231 - 28240 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Petitioners to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
PERKINS AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
PERKINS AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2014
County Circuit Court decision, Judge John A. Des Jardins, presiding. 2013AP578 State v. Knipfer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22
County Circuit Court decision, Judge John A. Des Jardins, presiding. 2013AP578 State v. Knipfer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January 2017
the committee’s “adopti[on] of 37 conditions of approval was a de jure approval of the [permit]” under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181614 - 2017-09-21
the committee’s “adopti[on] of 37 conditions of approval was a de jure approval of the [permit]” under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists to Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz
PERKINS, AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07
PERKINS, AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05
2007 WI APP 139
review de novo. State v. Johnson, 2002 WI App 224, ¶9, 257 Wis. 2d 736, 652 N.W.2d 642. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28861 - 2007-06-26
review de novo. State v. Johnson, 2002 WI App 224, ¶9, 257 Wis. 2d 736, 652 N.W.2d 642. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28861 - 2007-06-26
Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
. We therefore review this question de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18672 - 2005-06-21
. We therefore review this question de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18672 - 2005-06-21
State v. Michael A. Grindemann
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronnie J. Frayer
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2521 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2521 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Kathy C.
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2691 - 2005-03-31
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2691 - 2005-03-31