Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28231 - 28240 of 29823 for des.
Search results 28231 - 28240 of 29823 for des.
Frontsheet
is a question of law that we review de novo. Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2010 WI 59, ¶17, 326 Wis. 2d 155
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82775 - 2012-07-16
is a question of law that we review de novo. Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2010 WI 59, ¶17, 326 Wis. 2d 155
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82775 - 2012-07-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115395 - 2017-09-21
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 244
. Ambrosius, 185 Wis. 2d 879, 883 n.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30669 - 2014-09-15
. Ambrosius, 185 Wis. 2d 879, 883 n.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30669 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gary R. Brunette
this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We conclude that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12770 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We conclude that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelley L. Hauk
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4097 - 2017-09-20
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4097 - 2017-09-20
Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
of a matter to the jury is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14955 - 2005-03-31
of a matter to the jury is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14955 - 2005-03-31
Bartlett Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Kathy C.
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2692 - 2005-03-31
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2692 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Grindemann
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
a complaint is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
a complaint is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31