Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28251 - 28260 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17518 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Kloppenburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135726 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 56
the circuit court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277596 - 2020-10-13

[PDF] Nancy Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.
appellate courts review de novo, State v. Williams, 104 Wis. 2d 15, 21-22, 310 N.W.2d 601 (1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5841 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
confrontation rights, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ΒΆ11 The Confrontation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164842 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] General Star Indemnity Company v. The Bankruptcy Estate of Lake Geneva Sugar Shack, Inc.
, 325 N.W.2d 687, 691 (1982). We review questions of law de novo. See Gardner, 190 Wis.2d at 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11169 - 2017-09-19

Nancy Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.
courts review de novo, State v. Williams, 104 Wis. 2d 15, 21-22, 310 N.W.2d 601 (1981), the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5841 - 2005-03-31

State v. Earl L. Murdock
. The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15202 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 38
performance was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164869 - 2017-09-21

Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
a complaint is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9324 - 2005-03-31