Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28251 - 28260 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Melvin S. Lewis
we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). ¶39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144075 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
of law. We therefore review this question de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18672 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70229 - 2011-08-25

[PDF]
. § 802.08(2). ¶23 I review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729518 - 2023-11-16

State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3669 - 2005-04-24

COURT OF APPEALS
theories. We review questions of law de novo. Carolina Builders Corp. v. Dietzman, 2007 WI App 201, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38623 - 2009-07-29

Joseph Conway, Jr. v. Board of the Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
” is de novo, although we benefit from the analyses of the circuit court and the court of appeals. Seider
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16488 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 24
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28210 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Roy S. Thorp v. Town of Lebanon
the complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14388 - 2014-09-15