Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28251 - 28260 of 56178 for so.
Search results 28251 - 28260 of 56178 for so.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2007 WI App 224, ¶6, 305 Wis. 2d 695, 741 N.W.2d 481. “If so, the charges are multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
, 2007 WI App 224, ¶6, 305 Wis. 2d 695, 741 N.W.2d 481. “If so, the charges are multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. A sentence is unduly harsh only if its length “is ‘so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141396 - 2015-05-11
. A sentence is unduly harsh only if its length “is ‘so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141396 - 2015-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to the actor … and which causes him or her so to act.” Wis. Stat. § 939.46(1) (2005-06).[2] Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22
to the actor … and which causes him or her so to act.” Wis. Stat. § 939.46(1) (2005-06).[2] Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22
[PDF]
WI APP 41
station to “get down” “so she wouldn’t get hurt.” She also “gave [Rittman] the money as quick as I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47188 - 2014-09-15
station to “get down” “so she wouldn’t get hurt.” She also “gave [Rittman] the money as quick as I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47188 - 2014-09-15
State v. John F. Draves
prejudiced Draves. Assessing prejudice requires the ultimate determination of “whether counsel’s conduct so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced Draves. Assessing prejudice requires the ultimate determination of “whether counsel’s conduct so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
State v. John F. Draves
prejudiced Draves. Assessing prejudice requires the ultimate determination of “whether counsel’s conduct so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced Draves. Assessing prejudice requires the ultimate determination of “whether counsel’s conduct so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
Pierre A. LaForte v. Timothy W. Bandoli
101, 114-15, 450 N.W.2d 452 (1990), the court held that some type of bodily injury is so substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2583 - 2005-03-31
101, 114-15, 450 N.W.2d 452 (1990), the court held that some type of bodily injury is so substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2583 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Lee Miller
not require proof that Miller possessed an actual gun, so evidence that he possessed a soap gun would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
not require proof that Miller possessed an actual gun, so evidence that he possessed a soap gun would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
State v. Joseph A. Weiss
of the victim's injuries, but so does the potential severity of other punishment—incarceration and fines. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13402 - 2005-03-31
of the victim's injuries, but so does the potential severity of other punishment—incarceration and fines. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13402 - 2005-03-31
Richard D. Winters, Jr. v. Marianne Cooke
because of a gang-related disagreement and because he was ordered to do so by an inmate in the gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
because of a gang-related disagreement and because he was ordered to do so by an inmate in the gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31