Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28251 - 28260 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 28251 - 28260 of 58312 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the evidence was not lawfully obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138435 - 2015-03-31
the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the evidence was not lawfully obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138435 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 78
and Greggory filed this lawsuit alleging invasion of privacy, defamation, and abuse of process. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83843 - 2014-09-15
and Greggory filed this lawsuit alleging invasion of privacy, defamation, and abuse of process. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing maximum, consecutive sentences; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959795 - 2025-05-28
it did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing maximum, consecutive sentences; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959795 - 2025-05-28
Anne Marie Rosplock v. David Rosplock
Rosplock appeals from a trial court order granting David Rosplock’s motion for a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31
Rosplock appeals from a trial court order granting David Rosplock’s motion for a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31
Sharon Louise Taft v. Doane Derricks
to the floor of Derricks’s barn. Derricks contends that the trial court erred by instructing the jury to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15608 - 2005-03-31
to the floor of Derricks’s barn. Derricks contends that the trial court erred by instructing the jury to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Sullivan was convicted following a five-day jury trial of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629635 - 2023-03-08
arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Sullivan was convicted following a five-day jury trial of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629635 - 2023-03-08
State v. Latosha Armstead
remain subject to the jurisdiction of the adult court. Armstead claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31
remain subject to the jurisdiction of the adult court. Armstead claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Piddington
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding that Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15507 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding that Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael S. Piddington
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15507 - 2005-03-31
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15507 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to admit two items into evidence at trial, both of which he argues were necessary to his self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546527 - 2022-07-27
to admit two items into evidence at trial, both of which he argues were necessary to his self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546527 - 2022-07-27