Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28261 - 28270 of 29821 for des.

State v. Michael A. Grindemann
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI 1
.2d 367. Following our de novo review of the referee's legal conclusions, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27643 - 2007-01-03

[PDF] WI APP 217
. The application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30341 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16754 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 56
the circuit court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277596 - 2020-10-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the doctor visits may have had was de minimis. Accordingly, I.M. has failed to demonstrate “a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258147 - 2020-04-15

Jerry Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians
that we review de novo. J.L. Phillips & Assoc., Inc. v. E&H Plastic Corp., 217 Wis. 2d 348, 354, 577 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17461 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI App 179
circumstances exist are also both questions of law subject to independent, de novo review. See State v. Faust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42947 - 2009-12-15

State v. Gary Lewis Petty
of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16870 - 2005-03-31

State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3669 - 2005-04-24