Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was tainted. ¶23 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245580 - 2019-08-27

[PDF] WI App 47
, such as the interpretation of a municipal ordinance, our review is de novo. See id.; A & A Enters. v. City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980292 - 2025-09-18

Shane T. Drinkwater v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Court for Grant County, Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25375 - 2006-05-31

[PDF] WI APP 217
. The application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30341 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16750 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16766 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16760 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 52
review de novo. See State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 328. A statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22

[PDF] Jerry Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians
of Wis. Stat. § 806.245 to undisputed facts. Thus, it is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17451 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ryan J. Frayer
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2520 - 2005-03-31