Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
relevant in this context.” Id. at 20. We take this statement to mean that all of the legal principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31
relevant in this context.” Id. at 20. We take this statement to mean that all of the legal principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
noted that the record contained “express statements of the client’s will to maintain innocence.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079585 - 2026-02-24
noted that the record contained “express statements of the client’s will to maintain innocence.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079585 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
that “there was no statement” by the circuit court explaining why the 2007 placement order was no longer in Grace’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
that “there was no statement” by the circuit court explaining why the 2007 placement order was no longer in Grace’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
Andre Moore v. James P. Murphy
the witnesses to be credible because the statements appeared more rehearsed than from memory. Moore received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10047 - 2005-03-31
the witnesses to be credible because the statements appeared more rehearsed than from memory. Moore received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jovan T. Mull
). ¶10 Mull claims that he was prejudiced by the joinder because the testimony about his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6794 - 2017-09-20
). ¶10 Mull claims that he was prejudiced by the joinder because the testimony about his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6794 - 2017-09-20
State v. Nathan O. Jones
of the tools in his statement to police ignores the fact that he later also admitted that the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14024 - 2005-03-31
of the tools in his statement to police ignores the fact that he later also admitted that the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14024 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
no difference that Conner’s testimony was unrebutted. A witness’s statement need not be contradicted by other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107783 - 2014-02-03
no difference that Conner’s testimony was unrebutted. A witness’s statement need not be contradicted by other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107783 - 2014-02-03
State v. Clifford R. Rucks
his views as accurate statements of the law, which we do not. ¶9 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5792 - 2005-03-31
his views as accurate statements of the law, which we do not. ¶9 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5792 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas M. Maguire
. Maguire points to our statement that “upon a refusal, the officer may ‘immediately’ gain possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13603 - 2005-03-31
. Maguire points to our statement that “upon a refusal, the officer may ‘immediately’ gain possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Harlan Richards v. Jerry Smith
parole. That was a correct statement of law under which Richards was convicted: he received a life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3433 - 2017-09-19
parole. That was a correct statement of law under which Richards was convicted: he received a life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3433 - 2017-09-19