Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 69947 for his.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 69947 for his.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711426 - 2023-10-11
denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711426 - 2023-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
working for Zudac in May 2011. Brakefield worked entirely on commission. ¶3 With his employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
working for Zudac in May 2011. Brakefield worked entirely on commission. ¶3 With his employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
State v. Walter J. Griffin
agreement with Griffin. We affirm. ¶2 Griffin waived his preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
agreement with Griffin. We affirm. ¶2 Griffin waived his preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
Town of La Prairie v. Mule Hill Materials & Nursery, Inc.
.” He also stated that “Hughes indicated that he would haul from [his] Janesville property,” rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
.” He also stated that “Hughes indicated that he would haul from [his] Janesville property,” rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10).[1] Star argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60900 - 2011-03-14
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10).[1] Star argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60900 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
because the hearing officer did not make a required correction to it before he exhausted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81185 - 2012-04-18
because the hearing officer did not make a required correction to it before he exhausted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81185 - 2012-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction that commuted a part of his sentence pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.13, 1 reducing the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144523 - 2017-09-21
of conviction that commuted a part of his sentence pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.13, 1 reducing the term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2011. Brakefield worked entirely on commission. ¶3 With his employment, Brakefield was provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88637 - 2014-09-15
2011. Brakefield worked entirely on commission. ¶3 With his employment, Brakefield was provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
County of Iowa v. Leon T. Klinger
in denying his motion to suppress the result of the analysis of his blood. Klinger argued in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5047 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress the result of the analysis of his blood. Klinger argued in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5047 - 2005-03-31