Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
CA Blank Order
(1967), no issue of arguable merit appears. In case No. 2012CM802, Harvey entered a no-contest plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133449 - 2015-01-26
(1967), no issue of arguable merit appears. In case No. 2012CM802, Harvey entered a no-contest plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133449 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Van Remmen
driving offenses, as counted under Wisconsin Statute § 343.307(1)." Without objection, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21
driving offenses, as counted under Wisconsin Statute § 343.307(1)." Without objection, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a direct appeal in two Milwaukee County circuit court cases. We conclude that Baldwin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
to a direct appeal in two Milwaukee County circuit court cases. We conclude that Baldwin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 744 (1967). The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the cases, discusses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258279 - 2020-04-21
, 744 (1967). The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the cases, discusses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258279 - 2020-04-21
James Ferron v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
. The facts are not disputed. This is a highway condemnation case. DOT presented the Ferrons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11339 - 2005-03-31
. The facts are not disputed. This is a highway condemnation case. DOT presented the Ferrons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11339 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the Hamms in this case. For reasons explained in our January 4 order, this new order is nonfinal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94483 - 2014-09-15
of the Hamms in this case. For reasons explained in our January 4 order, this new order is nonfinal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In 2018, several months after the circuit court entered its orders in this case, the Director of State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243004 - 2019-06-27
. In 2018, several months after the circuit court entered its orders in this case, the Director of State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243004 - 2019-06-27
Kelly J. McKinstry v. Marvin J. Kramer
both. Indeed, that is what the jury found in this case. The Association’s argument, if adopted, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11223 - 2005-03-31
both. Indeed, that is what the jury found in this case. The Association’s argument, if adopted, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11223 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
coverage for the claims of the Hamms in this case. For reasons explained in our January 4 order, this new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94483 - 2013-03-20
coverage for the claims of the Hamms in this case. For reasons explained in our January 4 order, this new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94483 - 2013-03-20