Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. After a trial to the court, Cleaves was convicted of three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16

State v. Troy Petrauski
was illegally stopped. The trial court denied the motion and Petrauski was convicted of OWI as a repeater upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15618 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott K. Schaefer
for possession of cocaine, contrary to § 161.41(3m), Stats. We conclude that the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31

State v. Morris F Clement
not been fully tried because the trial court incorrectly assigned the burden of proof, and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19476 - 2005-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of whether (1) Robinson received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing; (2) the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174157 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Carl E. Cunningham
. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review the trial court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
with Josephson in his bedroom. ¶4 Before trial Josephson sought permission to ask Jennifer whether she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36394 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nikolaus Nytsch
of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4278 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Clover Belt Farm, LLC v. Linda Rademacher
is stayed pending the trial court’s ruling on the appellant’s request to approve her undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19714 - 2017-09-21

Peter J. Steen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
. PER CURIAM. Peter J. Steen and Jenny Steen appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12129 - 2005-03-31