Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28281 - 28290 of 84282 for case number.

[PDF] Charles A. Kramer v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area
2001 WI App 244 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3431 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael Thompson
. 2d 121, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). The case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2281 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 79
. No. 07-11C In the matter of review of Wis. Stat. § 801.54, discretionary transfer of cases
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173396 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court found the “more compelling” category of dangerousness in Charley’s case to be danger to himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697185 - 2023-08-30

Bruce D. Golembiewski v. City of Milwaukee
and conclusive in all cases.” Thus, this court only has jurisdiction over the writ of certiorari claim. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14380 - 2005-03-31

Jim Walter Color Separations v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2360
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14389 - 2005-03-31

State v. George Stone
. Based on the specific facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court’s amendment of the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14830 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
upon jury instructions. The court also informed the jury that the case would be submitted to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121672 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 78
2013 WI APP 78 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP823-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15

John A. Davis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
time we have considered this case. We previously vacated a summary judgment dismissing Davis’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2181 - 2005-03-31