Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for reconsideration and for relief from judgment after the Social Security Administration (SSA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91724 - 2013-01-16
motion for reconsideration and for relief from judgment after the Social Security Administration (SSA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91724 - 2013-01-16
Village of Thiensville v. Jon R. Olsen
. Section 805.17(3), Stats., states in pertinent part: “Upon its own motion ... the court may amend its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14276 - 2005-03-31
. Section 805.17(3), Stats., states in pertinent part: “Upon its own motion ... the court may amend its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14276 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
recklessly endangering safety and from an order denying his postconviction motion. We reject his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139720 - 2015-04-14
recklessly endangering safety and from an order denying his postconviction motion. We reject his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139720 - 2015-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Smothers
an order denying a postconviction motion filed by him pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 00-3553
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3452 - 2017-09-19
an order denying a postconviction motion filed by him pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 00-3553
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3452 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
filed a postconviction motion alleging, inter alia, that trial counsel was ineffective in representing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31
filed a postconviction motion alleging, inter alia, that trial counsel was ineffective in representing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8053 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth L. Moucha
for a month later, and at the sentencing Moucha orally moved to withdraw his pleas. A hearing on that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13322 - 2005-03-31
for a month later, and at the sentencing Moucha orally moved to withdraw his pleas. A hearing on that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13322 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W. Whistleman
possesses any undeveloped film, photographic negative, photograph, motion picture, videotape or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
possesses any undeveloped film, photographic negative, photograph, motion picture, videotape or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. John
erroneously denied his suppression motion and that the identification procedure at the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
erroneously denied his suppression motion and that the identification procedure at the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael B. Vernio
the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for sentencing modification or vacation. Vernio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7141 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for sentencing modification or vacation. Vernio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7141 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. Parisi maintains that he is entitled to a new trial on the seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212009 - 2018-05-02
postconviction motion for a new trial. Parisi maintains that he is entitled to a new trial on the seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212009 - 2018-05-02