Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
. The parties do not dispute that a court commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15326 - 2017-09-21
. The parties do not dispute that a court commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15326 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Slocum contends the matter was improperly commenced. According to Slocum, cases under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21
. 2 Slocum contends the matter was improperly commenced. According to Slocum, cases under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Travis Blanks
Correctional Institution that was transporting him to a court hearing in Dodge County. The case went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8701 - 2017-09-19
Correctional Institution that was transporting him to a court hearing in Dodge County. The case went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8701 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas W. Wood
factors are presented.”). ¶8 We hold that the law of new factors governs this case. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15821 - 2005-03-31
factors are presented.”). ¶8 We hold that the law of new factors governs this case. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Delbert L. Manke
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9398 - 2017-09-19
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9398 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21