Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 30059 for de.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of law which this court reviews de novo. See City of West Allis v. Sheedy, 211 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 564 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17085 - 2017-09-21
of law which this court reviews de novo. See City of West Allis v. Sheedy, 211 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 564 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17085 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Id. Although questions of law are ordinarily reviewed de novo, we give some weight to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
of law. Id. Although questions of law are ordinarily reviewed de novo, we give some weight to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84795 - 2014-09-15
a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84795 - 2014-09-15
State v. Matthew J. Trecroci
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Glen H. Rocker v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
that we review de novo." State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. "[O]ur
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24675 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo." State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. "[O]ur
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24675 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI App 244
.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de novo, the rationale underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30669 - 2007-11-27
.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de novo, the rationale underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30669 - 2007-11-27
Shane T. Drinkwater v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Court for Grant County, Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25375 - 2006-05-31
Court for Grant County, Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25375 - 2006-05-31
Gary L. Crawley v. Edward L. Mazola
of § 801.16, Stats., presents a question of law, which we review de novo, see Estate of Rice v. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12452 - 2005-03-31
of § 801.16, Stats., presents a question of law, which we review de novo, see Estate of Rice v. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12452 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900957 - 2025-01-15
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900957 - 2025-01-15
[PDF]
State v. Lionel N. Anderson
are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo.” Id. Because we are satisfied from our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19890 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo.” Id. Because we are satisfied from our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19890 - 2017-09-21