Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 69109 for he.
Search results 28291 - 28300 of 69109 for he.
State v. Russell D. Hobson
, 523 N.W.2d 177, 178 (Ct. App. 1994). Hobson argues that he entered his plea on the basis of defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9855 - 2005-03-31
, 523 N.W.2d 177, 178 (Ct. App. 1994). Hobson argues that he entered his plea on the basis of defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9855 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34662 - 2008-11-19
for postconviction relief. He argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34662 - 2008-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Jarrell L. Henry
denying his motion for postconviction relief. 2 He argues that WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4297 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for postconviction relief. 2 He argues that WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4297 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34662 - 2014-09-15
motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34662 - 2014-09-15
Ann E. Burton v. Michael S. Fish
of two years. He claims the order is invalid because he was given insufficient notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2005-03-31
of two years. He claims the order is invalid because he was given insufficient notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry L. Pierce
because he knowingly and voluntarily pleaded no contest. Before accepting the plea, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31
because he knowingly and voluntarily pleaded no contest. Before accepting the plea, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence as untimely. He challenges the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55888 - 2010-10-25
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence as untimely. He challenges the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55888 - 2010-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Henry L. Pierce
Pierce accordingly. Pierce cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his plea because he knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9274 - 2017-09-19
Pierce accordingly. Pierce cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his plea because he knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9274 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to address this court’s jurisdiction in their briefs. Gallentine’s briefs clarify that he is appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134885 - 2015-02-17
to address this court’s jurisdiction in their briefs. Gallentine’s briefs clarify that he is appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134885 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. However, the court denied Baker’s petition as premature, because he was not yet close enough to the end
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113009 - 2017-09-21
. However, the court denied Baker’s petition as premature, because he was not yet close enough to the end
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113009 - 2017-09-21