Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2831 - 2840 of 7603 for ow.

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court also assigned Nancy the debt still owing on the farm as a marital debt. The court then divided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38938 - 2009-08-03

[PDF] Huser Implement, Inc. v. Robert Wendt
him in the event that the tractor could not be sold for the amount which Wendt owed Deere. Despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13891 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kelly J. Kloss
on the issue—the trial court’s reasoning. Although we owe no deference to the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
, where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance will result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15979 - 2005-03-31

Superior Water Light & Power Co. v. Kevin Peterson
of all the payments he made for the unwanted fire protection service. Peterson admits that he owes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8305 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
be “collected by the DOC from 25% of funds under Wis. Stat. § 973.05(4)(b). Any balance due and owing to revert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77699 - 2012-02-06

[PDF] Michael L. Klabacka v. Brenda L. Klabacka
attorney moved to withdraw as her counsel on the basis that Brenda owed him $9,035.39 in attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15383 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lonny W. Sylte
-ordered payment obligations or to pay fees owed ....” This rule notwithstanding, our courts have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14938 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the question is one of law, we owe no deference to the trial court’s determination. Id. We agree, though
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216158 - 2018-08-01

[PDF] State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 Deference is owed to the trial court’s conclusions when reviewing Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2842 - 2017-09-19