Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2831 - 2840 of 20855 for word.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
there was strong evidence of Kuehn’s guilt. In other words, contrary to Kuehn’s assertions in this court, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272877 - 2020-07-28

[PDF] Danny R. Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
with a chain," and had a metal ladder. In other words, it was constructed, built, or put together
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17566 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
whether the word "shall" is mandatory or directory in nature, and whether it ultimately deprives
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98528 - 2013-07-30

[PDF] WI APP 66
disagree. ¶26 Alliance’s interpretation appears to read words into the statute, namely, that the NVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726837 - 2024-01-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because Keller had received word over his portable radio that Sullivan was on probation. I also do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186670 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
interpretation of a statute by an agency is one that ‘directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17306 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 87
, this later use of an expansive generally worded provision is not favored in landlord-tenant law. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36524 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Hunt Club Condominiums, Inc. v. Mac-Gray Services, Inc.
, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words are given their technical or special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26002 - 2017-09-21

John Kruczek v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
). “The general rule is that the word ‘shall’ is presumed mandatory when it appears in a statute.” Karow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7226 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] ECO, Inc v. City of Elkhorn
a request to contain any “magic words” nor do they prohibit the use of any words. While “request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4868 - 2017-09-19