Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28301 - 28310 of 63539 for records.
Search results 28301 - 28310 of 63539 for records.
State v. Reed Cudnohusky
. We conclude that it was reasonable for counsel to rely on other evidence in the record rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that it was reasonable for counsel to rely on other evidence in the record rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
month. We reverse, since the record supports the conclusion that Woodford has met the rehabilitative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
month. We reverse, since the record supports the conclusion that Woodford has met the rehabilitative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the facts apparent in the record.” Id. at 224 (citation omitted). This standard is utilized because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191792 - 2017-09-21
by the facts apparent in the record.” Id. at 224 (citation omitted). This standard is utilized because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Russell A. Williams
the officer may request a PBT; however, because the facts of record establish that the officer had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14330 - 2014-09-15
the officer may request a PBT; however, because the facts of record establish that the officer had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14330 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 925 (1998). Burnett must demonstrate “some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34278 - 2014-09-15
, 925 (1998). Burnett must demonstrate “some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34278 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
McCarraher, was “ousted” from that property. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
McCarraher, was “ousted” from that property. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136246 - 2015-03-02
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136246 - 2015-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
court independently reviews the record to determine whether the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98529 - 2013-06-25
court independently reviews the record to determine whether the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98529 - 2013-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
it? I said on the record we would clear that up later. I don’t know why you would do that. You know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2007-10-01
it? I said on the record we would clear that up later. I don’t know why you would do that. You know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2007-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Pralle
to understand the proceedings. Pralle’s contention that he was not competent is belied by the record. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20691 - 2017-09-21
to understand the proceedings. Pralle’s contention that he was not competent is belied by the record. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20691 - 2017-09-21