Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28301 - 28310 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 28301 - 28310 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Charlie Sislo v. AmericInn Motel & Suites
, P.J.[1] Charlie Sislo appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his small claims complaint in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5674 - 2005-03-31
, P.J.[1] Charlie Sislo appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his small claims complaint in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
household; and (4) the court should have granted Country’s motion for a new trial. Benson’s cross-appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97786 - 2014-09-15
household; and (4) the court should have granted Country’s motion for a new trial. Benson’s cross-appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97786 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not a resident of Benson’s household; and (4) the court should have granted Country’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97786 - 2013-06-03
was not a resident of Benson’s household; and (4) the court should have granted Country’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97786 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
Jacquie Hur v. LaVerne Holler
contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion under §§ 804.12(2) and 804.12(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9883 - 2017-09-19
contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion under §§ 804.12(2) and 804.12(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9883 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
home. Carl’s first trial in September 2016 was declared a mistrial when, on the fifth day of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372353 - 2021-06-02
home. Carl’s first trial in September 2016 was declared a mistrial when, on the fifth day of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372353 - 2021-06-02
Precision Erecting, Inc. v. AFW Foundry, Inc.
hinged on another’s status as agent or general contractor. In a previous summary judgment the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13823 - 2005-03-31
hinged on another’s status as agent or general contractor. In a previous summary judgment the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13823 - 2005-03-31
Jacquie Hur v. LaVerne Holler
was dismissed for discovery abuses. She contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2005-03-31
was dismissed for discovery abuses. She contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
(Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Adrian Castelan-Martinez
at the suppression hearing that he was intoxicated. The trial court found probable cause and denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24892 - 2017-09-21
at the suppression hearing that he was intoxicated. The trial court found probable cause and denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24892 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 In his postconviction motion, Bernard argued that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212941 - 2018-05-22
granting an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 In his postconviction motion, Bernard argued that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212941 - 2018-05-22