Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28311 - 28320 of 60202 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 28311 - 28320 of 60202 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also claimed newly discovered evidence. Finally, he asked for a new trial in the interests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
also claimed newly discovered evidence. Finally, he asked for a new trial in the interests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
included offenses at his jury trial. We reject Garcia’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124904 - 2017-09-21
included offenses at his jury trial. We reject Garcia’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reason for failing to raise this new claim in his earlier postconviction motion. The State also argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
reason for failing to raise this new claim in his earlier postconviction motion. The State also argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the right to assert that his sentence credit claim is procedurally barred under Witkowski because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640713 - 2023-04-04
the right to assert that his sentence credit claim is procedurally barred under Witkowski because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640713 - 2023-04-04
State v. Kenneth L. Lee
postconviction relief without a hearing on the ineffectiveness claim. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6982 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief without a hearing on the ineffectiveness claim. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6982 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jude G. Trautlein
motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop. He claims the police did not verify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25103 - 2006-05-08
motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop. He claims the police did not verify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25103 - 2006-05-08
CA Blank Order
challenge to the plea. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123241 - 2014-10-01
challenge to the plea. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123241 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jonathan Lisowski appeals an order dismissing his claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31687 - 2014-09-15
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jonathan Lisowski appeals an order dismissing his claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31687 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Senkbeil’s post-plea claims of confusion do not square with his failure to communicate it, his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124147 - 2017-09-21
. Senkbeil’s post-plea claims of confusion do not square with his failure to communicate it, his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jude G. Trautlein
from a traffic stop. He claims the police did not verify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25103 - 2017-09-21
from a traffic stop. He claims the police did not verify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25103 - 2017-09-21