Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28311 - 28320 of 58507 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Sharon Louise Taft v. Doane Derricks
of Derricks’s barn. Derricks contends that the trial court erred by instructing the jury to find him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15608 - 2017-09-21

WI App 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP334 Complete Title of ...
of privacy, defamation, and abuse of process. The trial court granted summary judgment to Patterson on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83843 - 2012-07-26

State v. Michael S. Piddington
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15507 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Craig I. Halverson v. June E. Halverson
division in the judgment of divorce from Craig Halverson. She contends the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2801 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Piddington
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court ordered the test results suppressed after concluding that Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15507 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tammy L. D.
of that proceeding, the court shall appoint counsel for Tammy and conduct a new trial, or the court shall reenter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15791 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to admit two items into evidence at trial, both of which he argues were necessary to his self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546527 - 2022-07-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Sullivan was convicted following a five-day jury trial of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629635 - 2023-03-08

COURT OF APPEALS
policy limit in its answer and proved that limit by introducing the insurance policy during the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144769 - 2015-07-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing maximum, consecutive sentences; and (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959795 - 2025-05-28