Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28321 - 28330 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
confrontation rights, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶11 The Confrontation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164842 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision satisfies that standard is a question of law we review de novo. Shannon, 398 Wis. 2d 685, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17

[PDF] State v. Jesse Franklin
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 47
. Determining which statute of limitations applies to an action is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687303 - 2023-10-11

[PDF] City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Company
, because it involves statutory construction, and our review is therefore de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5569 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of law which this court reviews de novo. See City of West Allis v. Sheedy, 211 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 564 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17085 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Id. Although questions of law are ordinarily reviewed de novo, we give some weight to a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84795 - 2014-09-15

State v. Matthew J. Trecroci
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Glen H. Rocker v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
that we review de novo." State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. "[O]ur
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24675 - 2017-09-21