Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28331 - 28340 of 29713 for des.

KW Holdings, LLC v. Town of Windsor
de novo. Id. However, in reviewing the reasons for the rejection, we affirm if there is adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5039 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin Gilmore
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16893 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, are questions we review de novo. See State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶28, __ Wis. 2d __, 734 N.W.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30931 - 2014-09-15

State v. Scott E. Oberst
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2522 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271059 - 2020-07-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the doctor visits may have had was de minimis. Accordingly, I.M. has failed to demonstrate “a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258147 - 2020-04-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel … presents a question of law that this court decides de novo.” Id. ¶47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=856508 - 2024-10-04

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16730 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
we review de novo. Fredrick v. City of Janesville, 92 Wis. 2d 685, 688, 285 N.W.2d 655, 657 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3175 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
14 meaning of a statute, and that is a question subject to de novo review. Fond du Lac County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131842 - 2017-09-21