Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28331 - 28340 of 63537 for records.
Search results 28331 - 28340 of 63537 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
). Satcher filed a response to the no-merit report. Upon review of the record and the submissions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90916 - 2012-12-26
). Satcher filed a response to the no-merit report. Upon review of the record and the submissions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90916 - 2012-12-26
State v. Kyle W.F.
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of which denies him a writ of coram nobis. 1 Upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189360 - 2017-09-21
of which denies him a writ of coram nobis. 1 Upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189360 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 154
)(a) obligation when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72442 - 2014-09-15
)(a) obligation when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72442 - 2014-09-15
State v. Calvin Morrison
of proceeding pro se. Because the record demonstrates the court did not advise Morrison of his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10996 - 2005-03-31
of proceeding pro se. Because the record demonstrates the court did not advise Morrison of his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10996 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that “the record conclusively demonstrates that Rodriguez is not entitled to the requested relief” and agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
that “the record conclusively demonstrates that Rodriguez is not entitled to the requested relief” and agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
Douglas Dahlin, Jr. v. James B. Dahlin
, 536 N.W.2d 415 (Ct. App. 1995). Our review of the record in light of the applicable legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16124 - 2017-09-21
, 536 N.W.2d 415 (Ct. App. 1995). Our review of the record in light of the applicable legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the movement,” see WIS. STAT. § 346.34(1)(b), and the record does not show that End’s lane change may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236520 - 2019-03-06
by the movement,” see WIS. STAT. § 346.34(1)(b), and the record does not show that End’s lane change may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236520 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
State v. Robert D. Bates
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7350 - 2005-03-31
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7350 - 2005-03-31