Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 29817 for des.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
. Resolution of this issue requires us to interpret § 942.01, an issue of law which we review de No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11857 - 2017-09-21
. Resolution of this issue requires us to interpret § 942.01, an issue of law which we review de No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Melvin S. Lewis
we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). ¶39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19
we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). ¶39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stephen Toliver
a defendant to relief presents a question of law, subject to our de novo review. Id. at 310. If the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
a defendant to relief presents a question of law, subject to our de novo review. Id. at 310. If the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70229 - 2011-08-25
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70229 - 2011-08-25
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald R. Kitten v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
the question presented, we review the agency's interpretation de novo. Id. ¶30 In this case, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16458 - 2017-09-21
the question presented, we review the agency's interpretation de novo. Id. ¶30 In this case, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 18
consistently held that an agency decision is not automatically one of first impression and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133876 - 2017-09-21
consistently held that an agency decision is not automatically one of first impression and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133876 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert K. Rymer
which we review de novo. See id. at 310. ¶7 Prior to filing his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15624 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. See id. at 310. ¶7 Prior to filing his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jerry Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians
of Wis. Stat. § 806.245 to undisputed facts. Thus, it is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17451 - 2017-09-21
of Wis. Stat. § 806.245 to undisputed facts. Thus, it is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17451 - 2017-09-21