Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 68869 for he.

Tina Marie Olson v. Bruce Alan Olson
. He argues that the trial court erroneously applied § 806.07, Stats., failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14013 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
Lab of Hygiene testified about the procedures he used to test the blood sample Carter had provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6419 - 2017-09-19

Jeanette E. Normington v. Peter J. Normington
services he was provided by the corporation of which he was part owner; (2) imputing $5,000 annual income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16212 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven G. Walters
and notified the State via letter that he intended to call expert witnesses at trial. This notification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4192 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven G. Walters
that he intended to call expert witnesses at trial. This notification stated, in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4192 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, with various enhancers. A jury convicted Powells on all charges, and he was sentenced to an aggregate fifty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125969 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of West Bend v. Richard B. Wilkens
, 2002. While operating his radar detector on Creek Road at approximately 2:00 a.m., he observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7590 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Mayer is a sixteen-year sheriff’s department veteran. He worked primarily in the field during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243823 - 2019-07-16

[PDF] State v. Robert Simmons
, following his arrest for a municipal ordinance violation. He argues that, initially, the officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7353 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Wisconsin Professional Police Association v. Oneida County
his power when he chose the County’s final offer; (2) the arbitrator improperly permitted the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2266 - 2017-09-19