Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 63537 for records.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 63537 for records.
State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
court exercised its discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31
court exercised its discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Roy Peterson
of cocaine, a razor blade and short straws. A search of police records revealed that Peterson had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8876 - 2017-09-19
of cocaine, a razor blade and short straws. A search of police records revealed that Peterson had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8876 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
). A reviewing court will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary determination if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
). A reviewing court will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary determination if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel E. Rohe
not testify at trial and the medical record they prepared was not admitted. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15049 - 2005-03-31
not testify at trial and the medical record they prepared was not admitted. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106983 - 2017-09-21
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106983 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 110. The record is thus simply inadequate to support the first element of the Tiepelman analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
.2d 110. The record is thus simply inadequate to support the first element of the Tiepelman analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
State v. William Lee Brown
(2) (b), on the record, with the approval of the court and the consent of the state. In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13495 - 2017-09-21
(2) (b), on the record, with the approval of the court and the consent of the state. In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13495 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit reports and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
considering the no-merit reports and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
State v. Anthony Larson
If the record contains evidence that the circuit court properly exercised discretion, we must affirm. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3695 - 2005-03-31
If the record contains evidence that the circuit court properly exercised discretion, we must affirm. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3695 - 2005-03-31