Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 28341 - 28350 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 In his postconviction motion, Bernard argued that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212941 - 2018-05-22
granting an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 In his postconviction motion, Bernard argued that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212941 - 2018-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
Heitkemper over for trial. 1 Heitkemper was initially charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8171 - 2017-09-19
Heitkemper over for trial. 1 Heitkemper was initially charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8171 - 2017-09-19
Jacquie Hur v. LaVerne Holler
was dismissed for discovery abuses. She contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2005-03-31
was dismissed for discovery abuses. She contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Jones
of WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (2003-04). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
of WIS. STAT. § 941.23 (2003-04). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rock County DHS v. Daphnea W.
and requested a jury trial. She also agreed to waive the usual time limits to permit discovery in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21002 - 2017-09-21
and requested a jury trial. She also agreed to waive the usual time limits to permit discovery in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Donald P. Mueller v. Sentry Insurance
disagree with these contentions and affirm the order of the trial court. FACTS 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3969 - 2017-09-20
disagree with these contentions and affirm the order of the trial court. FACTS 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3969 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the trial court affirming a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (“LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192312 - 2017-09-21
an order of the trial court affirming a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (“LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
home. Carl’s first trial in September 2016 was declared a mistrial when, on the fifth day of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372353 - 2021-06-02
home. Carl’s first trial in September 2016 was declared a mistrial when, on the fifth day of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372353 - 2021-06-02
The Estate of June G. Wheeler v. Patricia Franco
went to trial and in a written decision dated October 2, 2001, the trial court rejected the Saucedas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4694 - 2005-03-31
went to trial and in a written decision dated October 2, 2001, the trial court rejected the Saucedas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
(Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20