Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28351 - 28360 of 39129 for c's.
Search results 28351 - 28360 of 39129 for c's.
State v. Christopher Walker
homicide. Accordingly, we must reject his sufficiency of the evidence argument. C. Jury Instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
homicide. Accordingly, we must reject his sufficiency of the evidence argument. C. Jury Instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8817 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Allan Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
Electric Power Co., 44 Wis. 2d 571, 172 N.W.2d 161 (1969), for the proposition that “‘[c]ompliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3112 - 2017-09-20
Electric Power Co., 44 Wis. 2d 571, 172 N.W.2d 161 (1969), for the proposition that “‘[c]ompliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3112 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with their parents or family members—was erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 48.426(3)(c). M.D.W. points out that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207176 - 2018-01-23
with their parents or family members—was erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 48.426(3)(c). M.D.W. points out that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207176 - 2018-01-23
State v. Eric Davis
appellate issue exists.[4] C. Davis’s Testimony Davis testified in his own defense. He did so against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13594 - 2005-03-31
appellate issue exists.[4] C. Davis’s Testimony Davis testified in his own defense. He did so against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
not depreciate the seriousness of the offense. (c) That retaining jurisdiction is not necessary to deter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
not depreciate the seriousness of the offense. (c) That retaining jurisdiction is not necessary to deter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52364 - 2010-07-19
Gary A. Miller v. Jodi Lynn Ehrke
, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: gerald c. nichol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6290 - 2005-03-31
, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: gerald c. nichol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the dangerousness criterion in WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1)(c); and (2) his condition is permanent as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
the dangerousness criterion in WIS. STAT. § 55.08(1)(c); and (2) his condition is permanent as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
to discover it; and (c) The evidence is material and not cumulative; and (d) The new evidence would probably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35479 - 2009-02-09
to discover it; and (c) The evidence is material and not cumulative; and (d) The new evidence would probably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35479 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133828 - 2017-09-21
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: SCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133828 - 2017-09-21