Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28351 - 28360 of 50556 for our.

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 20-03
constitutional principle in our federal system that congressional reapportionment and state legislative
/supreme/docs/2003petition.pdf - 2020-06-03

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Comments from Governor's Juvenile Justice Commission
participants is at risk. The GJJC adopted this position unanimously on November 9, 2021, during our most
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgovjuvjustcmsn.pdf - 2021-12-13

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 12-09 - comments from State Bar of Wisconsin
communication channels. Our Committee is interested in changes to SCR 98.07 because the rule requires
/supreme/docs/1209commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-01-07

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 13-09 - Comments from Wisconsin State Bar
the appropriate age bracket. However, as with judicial membership, our members self-select their appropriate
/supreme/docs/1309commentsstatebar.pdf - 2014-01-03

[PDF] Supreme Court Rules petition 10-08 comment Wis. Judicare
to work reduced hours. Indicia of the poverty that now exists in Wisconsin, and specifically in our
/supreme/docs/1008commentwijudicare.pdf - 2011-09-12

[PDF] 2024AP000164 - 4-18-2024 Court Order
, the cornerstone of our democratic government." I have no doubt the Governor is "interested" in the policy
/supreme/docs/2024AP164_04-18-24.pdf - 2024-04-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP979-NM 4 Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015735 - 2025-09-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 767.451(1)(a)1. (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of Jennifer’s brief and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Our independent review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14

State v. Talib Amin Akbar
. Based upon our review of the record, we reject Abkar's contention that he was denied his right to self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8863 - 2005-03-31