Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28361 - 28370 of 51576 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

Citifinancial, Inc. v. Samantha Lee Curtis
to direct the trial court to award her attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 425.308(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6019 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
affirmed. Motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. This opinion will not be published. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27023 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] M. Susan Churchill v. WFA Econometrics Corporation
award of “court costs and attorney’s fees” to the dollar amount of $38,264.23. Because we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4981 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Adam Austin-White v. Todd C. Young
, and cause remanded. No costs. 3 Even if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7445 - 2017-09-20

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
§ 48.29. By the Court.—Orders reversed; cause remanded with directions. No costs on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7644 - 2005-03-31

07AP2261 State v. Korry L. Ardell.doc
for the cost of preparing the discovery and the fee had to be paid prior to release of the discovery; however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31914 - 2008-02-26

Megal Laundromat, Inc. v. Suds-R-Us, Inc.
stipulated to the dismissal of the counterclaim without prejudice and without costs. [3] Megal also argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Citifinancial, Inc. v. Samantha Lee Curtis
Curtis also requests us to direct the trial court to award her attorney’s fees and costs pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6019 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
who are using certain government services help to defray their cost. ¶11 Secondly, the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29934 - 2014-09-15

Pekay Speciality Contracting v. Madson Tiling & Excavating, Inc.
for this type of damage. Our customer has held us responsible for the damages costing us in excess of $5000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12812 - 2005-03-31