Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28361 - 28370 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] Joseph Conway, Jr. v. Board of the Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
whether an administrative rule “exceeds statutory authority” is de novo, although we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16488 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
is a question of law which we review de novo. Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis.2d 506, 512, 405 N.W.2d 303, 306 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
those findings are clearly erroneous, but we decide de novo whether that conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
grant Mitsubishi’s petition for supervisory relief concluding, after a de novo review, Bilder, 112 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17573 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36632 - 2009-05-27

State v. William C. Ruleau
and prejudicial are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128. Since a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6754 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
' decisions and urges a six-month suspension. ¶43 We consider appropriate discipline de novo but we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59088 - 2011-01-19

Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
which this court reviews de novo. See City of West Allis v. Sheedy, 211 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 564 N.W.2d 708
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17085 - 2005-03-31

Connie J. Motola v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
determination no deference. Thus, our review is de novo. I. ¶18 Before we review LIRC's reasoning, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17233 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to the Railway. The Keeses now appeal. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96809 - 2013-05-13