Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28361 - 28370 of 30059 for de.
Search results 28361 - 28370 of 30059 for de.
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 178
the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34584 - 2011-06-14
the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34584 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such questions de novo. State v. Schaefer, 2008 WI 25, ¶17, 308 Wis. 2d 279, 746 N.W.2d 457. ¶46 By way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434015 - 2021-11-22
such questions de novo. State v. Schaefer, 2008 WI 25, ¶17, 308 Wis. 2d 279, 746 N.W.2d 457. ¶46 By way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434015 - 2021-11-22
State v. Michael A. Grindemann
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
, in which we defer to trial courts’ determinations that a sentence is not too harsh, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
properly preserved an assertion or argument is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833444 - 2024-08-01
properly preserved an assertion or argument is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833444 - 2024-08-01
[PDF]
WI App 52
review de novo. See State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 328. A statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22
review de novo. See State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 328. A statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
a complaint is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
a complaint is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William K. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
or that the actor intended to destroy evidence. This is a legal question, which we review de novo, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14128 - 2014-09-15
or that the actor intended to destroy evidence. This is a legal question, which we review de novo, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208492 - 2018-02-15
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208492 - 2018-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21