Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28361 - 28370 of 29817 for des.
Search results 28361 - 28370 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
. Resolution of this issue requires us to interpret § 942.01, an issue of law which we review de No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11857 - 2017-09-21
. Resolution of this issue requires us to interpret § 942.01, an issue of law which we review de No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Melvin S. Lewis
we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). ¶39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19
we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). ¶39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Label Corporation v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance Company
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226 Wis. 2d at 805
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17354 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226 Wis. 2d at 805
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17354 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stephen Toliver
a defendant to relief presents a question of law, subject to our de novo review. Id. at 310. If the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
a defendant to relief presents a question of law, subject to our de novo review. Id. at 310. If the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70229 - 2011-08-25
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70229 - 2011-08-25
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald R. Kitten v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
the question presented, we review the agency's interpretation de novo. Id. ¶30 In this case, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16458 - 2017-09-21
the question presented, we review the agency's interpretation de novo. Id. ¶30 In this case, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nancy Lamoreux v. Stephen L. Oreck
of summary judgment, we employ the same standard as that of the trial court, and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6724 - 2017-09-20
of summary judgment, we employ the same standard as that of the trial court, and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6724 - 2017-09-20