Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Jay B. Stephany
initiates further communication. Id. at 484-85. In the present case, Stephany told Nordin that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12787 - 2017-09-21
initiates further communication. Id. at 484-85. In the present case, Stephany told Nordin that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12787 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Howard S. Cleaves
instruction properly reflected the applicable law and the facts of this case. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19
instruction properly reflected the applicable law and the facts of this case. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Goodman
in this case. After reviewing the briefs, the trial court concluded: There is no question that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25089 - 2006-05-08
in this case. After reviewing the briefs, the trial court concluded: There is no question that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25089 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Blodgett
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
Oskar B. McMillian v. Terry L. Landwehr
, we affirm. BACKGROUND This case has an exceedingly complicated procedural history. We will discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13449 - 2005-03-31
, we affirm. BACKGROUND This case has an exceedingly complicated procedural history. We will discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13449 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
fifth offense or subsequent in Winnebago County case No. 04CF391. That occurred on September 3rd, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
fifth offense or subsequent in Winnebago County case No. 04CF391. That occurred on September 3rd, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Darin W. Baratka
2002 WI App 288 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 288 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2 Hartfield, who had a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2 Hartfield, who had a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20