Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 30045 for de.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 30045 for de.
Monroe County v. Jennifer V.
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Wittrock, 119 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Wittrock, 119 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17520 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision satisfies that standard is a question of law we review de novo. Shannon, 398 Wis. 2d 685, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17
decision satisfies that standard is a question of law we review de novo. Shannon, 398 Wis. 2d 685, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Schulpius
that we analyze de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995). III ¶18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20871 - 2017-09-21
that we analyze de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995). III ¶18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20871 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert K. Rymer
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15624 - 2005-03-31
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15624 - 2005-03-31
Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
of a matter to the jury is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15509 - 2005-03-31
of a matter to the jury is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15509 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31
M. Carol Weissgerber v. Hans Weissgerber, Jr.
a reasonable conclusion. Id. Our review of the circuit court’s decision here is therefore not de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6047 - 2005-03-31
a reasonable conclusion. Id. Our review of the circuit court’s decision here is therefore not de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60751 - 2014-09-15
was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60751 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 163
and apply Wis. Stat. § 779.02(5). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29384 - 2007-07-24
and apply Wis. Stat. § 779.02(5). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29384 - 2007-07-24