Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 30172 for de.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 30172 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Kloppenburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135726 - 2017-09-21
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Kloppenburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135726 - 2017-09-21
State v. Earl L. Murdock
. The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15202 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 62
to LIRC’s decisions: great weight, due weight, or no weight (de novo review). Racine Harley- Davidson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94693 - 2014-09-15
to LIRC’s decisions: great weight, due weight, or no weight (de novo review). Racine Harley- Davidson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 56
the circuit court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277596 - 2020-10-13
the circuit court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277596 - 2020-10-13
Marie Calbert v. Erin Briggs
summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI App 60, 242 Wis. 2d 173, 181, 625 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4028 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI App 60, 242 Wis. 2d 173, 181, 625 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4028 - 2005-03-31
WI App 18 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1113 Complete Title ...
consistently held that an agency decision is not automatically one of first impression and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133876 - 2015-02-24
consistently held that an agency decision is not automatically one of first impression and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133876 - 2015-02-24
State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
authority to modify its sentence).[5] We review questions of law de novo. See Crochiere, 273 Wis. 2d 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25
authority to modify its sentence).[5] We review questions of law de novo. See Crochiere, 273 Wis. 2d 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25
Frontsheet
require us to interpret the meaning of a statute, and that is a question subject to de novo review. Fond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131842 - 2014-12-15
require us to interpret the meaning of a statute, and that is a question subject to de novo review. Fond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131842 - 2014-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary Lewis Petty
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16870 - 2017-09-21
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Allen M.
of a statute presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12260 - 2017-09-21
of a statute presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12260 - 2017-09-21