Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 29823 for des.
Search results 28371 - 28380 of 29823 for des.
2007 WI APP 201
involve questions of law, which we review de novo. Gaugert v. Duve, 2001 WI 83, ¶15, 244 Wis. 2d 691, 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29688 - 2007-08-27
involve questions of law, which we review de novo. Gaugert v. Duve, 2001 WI 83, ¶15, 244 Wis. 2d 691, 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29688 - 2007-08-27
J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Fredrick v. City of Janesville, 92 Wis. 2d 685, 688, 285 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3175 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Fredrick v. City of Janesville, 92 Wis. 2d 685, 688, 285 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3175 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Charles K. Krombach
conclusions of law subject to de novo review). We also agree that Attorney Krombach should pay restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20749 - 2005-12-21
conclusions of law subject to de novo review). We also agree that Attorney Krombach should pay restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20749 - 2005-12-21
Monroe County v. Jennifer V.
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Wittrock, 119 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Wittrock, 119 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
authority to modify its sentence).[5] We review questions of law de novo. See Crochiere, 273 Wis. 2d 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25
authority to modify its sentence).[5] We review questions of law de novo. See Crochiere, 273 Wis. 2d 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25
2007 WI App 244
.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de novo, the rationale underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30669 - 2007-11-27
.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de novo, the rationale underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30669 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16768 - 2017-09-21
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17519 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17518 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17518 - 2017-09-21