Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28381 - 28390 of 63601 for records.
Search results 28381 - 28390 of 63601 for records.
Jennifer Redding v. Mark Ralfs
argument, there is nothing in the record that supports a finding that Ralfs misrepresented or falsified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11426 - 2005-03-31
argument, there is nothing in the record that supports a finding that Ralfs misrepresented or falsified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1981). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
(1981). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that Redmond has not shown that the trial court actually relied on the inaccuracy in his prior record when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34706 - 2008-11-24
, and that Redmond has not shown that the trial court actually relied on the inaccuracy in his prior record when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34706 - 2008-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
’ arguments on appeal rely on mischaracterization of the circuit’s court’s decision, facts outside the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45341 - 2010-01-06
’ arguments on appeal rely on mischaracterization of the circuit’s court’s decision, facts outside the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45341 - 2010-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record, and he knew the court routinely read the documents in the record before sentencing. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
the record, and he knew the court routinely read the documents in the record before sentencing. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
). A reviewing court will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary determination if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
). A reviewing court will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary determination if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Martin M. Dudek
had the No. 2006AP204 5 right to counsel, we see nothing in the record to indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26240 - 2017-09-21
had the No. 2006AP204 5 right to counsel, we see nothing in the record to indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26240 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Peter J. Ambler v. Richard F. Rice
the record to determine whether any genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9563 - 2017-09-19
the record to determine whether any genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9563 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of East Troy v. Village of Mukwonago
determination, we examine the record to determine if the trial court logically interpreted the facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4876 - 2017-09-19
determination, we examine the record to determine if the trial court logically interpreted the facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4876 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
records, text messages, and pictures—submitted by the Petitioner, and thus he contends that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471216 - 2022-01-11
records, text messages, and pictures—submitted by the Petitioner, and thus he contends that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471216 - 2022-01-11