Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28391 - 28400 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 28391 - 28400 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Luster Goodman, Jr.
)(b)1 and 161.41(3m), STATS. He claims that the trial court violated his right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20
)(b)1 and 161.41(3m), STATS. He claims that the trial court violated his right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
what he or she is doing when the plea is entered. We reject Franklin’s claim that he should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248473 - 2019-10-07
what he or she is doing when the plea is entered. We reject Franklin’s claim that he should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248473 - 2019-10-07
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5387 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5387 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5389 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated, a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5389 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victoria D. Roesing
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] Roesing claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] Roesing claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
her sentence. She claimed the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20
her sentence. She claimed the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32710 - 2008-05-20
State v. Anthony Kimber
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to §§ 940.01(1), 943.02(1)(a), 941.30(1), and 939.62, Stats. Kimber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9613 - 2005-03-31
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to §§ 940.01(1), 943.02(1)(a), 941.30(1), and 939.62, Stats. Kimber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9613 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). John T. Luckett, pro se, appeals an order denying postconviction relief. He claims a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15
). John T. Luckett, pro se, appeals an order denying postconviction relief. He claims a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15
State v. Phillip Wayne Harvey
, 451 N.W.2d 759 (Ct. App. 1989) (“Simply to label a claimed error as constitutional does not make it so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18774 - 2005-07-13
, 451 N.W.2d 759 (Ct. App. 1989) (“Simply to label a claimed error as constitutional does not make it so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18774 - 2005-07-13
State v. Brian Blumenberg
. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15519 - 2005-03-31
. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15519 - 2005-03-31