Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28391 - 28400 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28391 - 28400 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Richard J. Wooster
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of child pornography within a single case do not constitute convictions on “separate occasions” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767912 - 2024-02-28
of child pornography within a single case do not constitute convictions on “separate occasions” under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767912 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
State v. Delbert L. Manke
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9400 - 2017-09-19
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9400 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144577 - 2017-09-21
to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
. The parties do not dispute that a court commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15326 - 2017-09-21
. The parties do not dispute that a court commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15326 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Pierce County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207120 - 2018-01-17
affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Pierce County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207120 - 2018-01-17
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31