Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 29712 for des.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
... as to be ... a de facto life sentence, and so the logic of Miller applies.” See McKinley, 809 F.3d at 911. Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21
... as to be ... a de facto life sentence, and so the logic of Miller applies.” See McKinley, 809 F.3d at 911. Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 102
but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kalal, 2002
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53203 - 2014-09-15
but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kalal, 2002
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53203 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Similarly, whether a person has standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96078 - 2014-09-15
of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Similarly, whether a person has standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Westcott
below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. See id. at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
State v. Romel D.
of law, which [is reviewed] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84, 88 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
of law, which [is reviewed] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84, 88 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
. The allocation of the burden of proof is a question of law, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20
. The allocation of the burden of proof is a question of law, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See State v. Miller, 2004 WI App 117, ¶20, 274 Wis. 2d 471, 683 N.W.2d 485. If an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09
de novo. See State v. Miller, 2004 WI App 117, ¶20, 274 Wis. 2d 471, 683 N.W.2d 485. If an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980009 - 2025-07-09