Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo because the circuit court’s evidentiary decision rested on its determination that reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50232 - 2010-05-25
is de novo because the circuit court’s evidentiary decision rested on its determination that reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50232 - 2010-05-25
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Everts
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward C. Brandau
of constitutional fact we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional fact we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI 20
in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding or has any other more than de minimis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28170 - 2007-02-15
in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding or has any other more than de minimis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28170 - 2007-02-15
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31
John J.A. Reuter v. Covenant Healthcare System, Inc.
Whether contractual language is ambiguous presents an issue of law subject to de novo review. See Capital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15967 - 2005-03-31
Whether contractual language is ambiguous presents an issue of law subject to de novo review. See Capital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15967 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
attorney, and Linda M. Van De Water, assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31
attorney, and Linda M. Van De Water, assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 Donner asserts that our review is de novo because the circuit court’s evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50232 - 2014-09-15
3 Donner asserts that our review is de novo because the circuit court’s evidentiary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50232 - 2014-09-15
Sentry Insurance v. Jay Schrank
of the circuit court’s non-final order. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19683 - 2005-12-11
of the circuit court’s non-final order. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19683 - 2005-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, whether counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27102 - 2006-11-14
, whether counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27102 - 2006-11-14