Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the citation in municipal proceedings and timely appealed to the circuit court for a jury trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117692 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29202 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo because the circuit court’s evidentiary decision rested on its determination that reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50232 - 2010-05-25

[PDF] Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
. The allocation of the burden of proof is a question of law, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Milwaukee Alarm Company, Inc. v. Felmers O. Chaney
with this appeal. Our review of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12266 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Everts
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21

State v. Edward C. Brandau
of constitutional fact we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31

Ruth M. Erickson v. Alvin Zimmerman
,[1] our review is de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13872 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI 20
in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding or has any other more than de minimis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28170 - 2007-02-15

Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31